STREAM: Political Legitimacy and ‘Customary’ Rule in Local African Contexts

STREAM: Political Legitimacy and ‘Customary’ Rule in Local African Contexts

Scholarship on African politics has often focused on national-level states-people and elections. Instead, this stream will examine how local leaders have negotiated or in some cases failed to negotiate their legitimacy in local contexts. We are particularly interested in paper proposals dealing with the ways in which African leaders have deployed discourses relating to ‘custom’ to maintain or acquire power in local contexts in the pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial periods. We are particularly looking for papers that dig deeply into the pre-colonial and colonial foundations of chiefship and other forms of local authority, and address a range of different questions and themes about local politics including but not limited to: what kind of idioms do leaders deploy to gain ‘customary’ power in local communities? Why do those seeking power choose to use some expressions of ‘custom’ above others? To what extent do local economies shape articulations of custom? How do and how have churches and missionaries influence(d) ‘customary’ authority?

We are also interested in the ways that ‘customary’ authority intersects with national-level political debates and policies, such as in the most recent and devastating violence in the Kasaï province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Given the importance of this topic to the stream, we are interested in papers that examine how national governments and NGOs have tried to interfere with or alter local interpretations of ‘customary’ rule. We are also interested in receiving paper proposals that examine how much national and international policies account for ‘custom’ when working in and with chieftaincies. The issue of violence and ‘custom’ will be equally significant in these discussions of customary rule. For example, in what contexts do violent contests over custom occur? Does ‘customary’ rule encourage or prevent violent contests for power?

We expect panels to cover a range of different local contexts and historical periods in order to do justice to the wide repertoire of political expressions of the ‘customary.’ Although we are especially interested in historical examples of discourses surrounding contests about local political legitimacy, we would also be open to hearing from those who have worked on present-day examples such as the crisis in the DRC’s Kasai Province, or on examples from elsewhere.

The stream keynote speaker is Professor in Modern African History, Justin Willis. (https://www.dur.ac.uk/research/directory/staff/?mode=staff&id=1570)

CONFIRMED PANELS

Panel 1: Chieftainship, Legitimacy, and the Colonial Construction of Indirect Rule

  • The Commission for the Protection of the Native Population and the complex ‘construction’ of Belgian indirect rule in 20th century colonial Congo, Schalbroeck, Eva (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom)
  • The Chief and the Church: Catholic Power in Tanganyika, South-Eastern Belgian Congo, 1909-1960, Loffman, Reuben Alexander (Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom)
  • Traditional Rulers and Crisis of Legitimacy in the post-colonial Nigeria: The case of the Igede of Central Nigeria, Iyanya, Victor (Benue State University Makurdi, Makurdi, Nigeria)

Panel 2: Divergent Models of Political Legitimacy in the Longue Durée

  • Political Legitimacy and “Customary” Rule in Capitalist Liberal Democracies: The Case of South Africa, Ubink, Janine (Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands)
  • The Roaring Sixties in the Eastern Congo: the Need for a Long-Term Perspective, Mathys, Gillian (Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium)
  • Chiefs in Postcolonial Governance and Development in Nigeria: Issues and Options, Nwaka, Geoffrey (Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria, Uturu, Nigeria)
  • Chieftaincy, the state and legitimacy: A comparative study between Kom and Bali in the North-West Cameroon, Awoh, Emmanuel Lohkoko (The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)

Panel 3: Objects, Shrines and Secrecy: Performing Political Legitimacy from Below

  • The Colonial Chieftaincy and the Question of Legitimacy in Mayombe (Lower Congo, DRC), Vanhee, Hein (Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium | Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium)
  • Spiritual Healing and Politics: the Case of Mani in a Longue Durée and Cross-Border Perspective (South Sudan, DRCongo, 1880-today), Pendle, Naomi (London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom) and van Bockhaven, Vicky (Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium)
  • Ritual performance and political legitimacy: a chieftaincy conflict in the Western Region of Ghana, Lepore, Benedetta (University of Naples, “L’Orientale”, Naples, Italy)
  • ‘We Swore by the Antoa Nyamaa to Vote for him’: The Invocation of Rituals as Forms of Social Accountability Mechanisms in Electoral Politics at the Grassroots in Ghana, Bob-Milliar, George (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi-Ghana, Cambridge, United Kingdom)
  • Who’s Capacity? Capacity Building and the Bureaucratization of the Institution of Chieftaincy, Brefo, Henry (University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom)

Panel 4: The Quest for Legitimacy: Customary Law as ‘Living Law’

Convenors: Okot, Betty (Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom), Giussani, Luigi  (Institute of Higher Education, Kampala) and Pnina Werbner (Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom)

It has become almost a truism to argue that customary law is ‘living law’, responsive to changing circumstances (see Fombad 2004: 183, 191; Himonga and Moore 2015). The question is, however, whether changes in unwritten law are effected through customary judicial deliberation in court regarding notions of contemporary morality – of ‘fairness’, equity and reasonableness, in response to changing circumstances, as Gluckman, for example, argued (1955, 1963)? Some legal anthropologists studying customary law have envisaged it as consisting of an unsystematic “loosely constructed repertoire” (Comaroff and Roberts 1981: 18) of rules, habits, and norms, often contradictory or ambiguous. According to this view, litigants may and do formulate multiple interpretations (“paradigms”) in their defence, as they engage in negotiations, alliance-making, and individual political maneuverings. Hence in this view, the whole range of customary rules, norms, and values is constantly being constructed and reconstituted. Against that, others have argued that contemporary customary law must incorporate the current state of prevalent statutory legal and constitutional assumptions. This implies, among other things, that customary law has a historical trajectory: at any given time, although largely unwritten, a corpus of more or less agreed customary law does exist for any particular place, so that customary judges are not simply dealing with an amorphous body of unwritten ‘custom and law’, even if this is what they often claim. A second question this session will address concerns the re-invocation of customary law after a period of conflict or civil war as in the case of the recent conflict in Uganda. How is customary law re-instated as legitimate and binding in these circumstances?

  • Heritage as Living Law: The Return to Te-Kwaro (Tradition) among the Acholi after the Civil War in Northern Uganda, Okot, Betty (Keele University, Newcastle, United Kingdom)
  • A Case of Inheritance: From Citizens’ Forum to Magisterial Justice in Botswana’s Customary Courts, Werbner, Pnina (Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom) and Werbner, Richard (University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom)”
  • Breaking the Yard: A Filmed Case of Adultery, Moremi Court, Botswana, Werbner, Richard (University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom)
  • Contemporary challenges to the application of customary law in Botswana, Dinokopila, Bonolo (University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana)
  • Customary Law: The Living Reality of the People of Northern Uganda, Malagala, Tenywa (Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda)
  • Palavers And Rituals For Conflict Resolution In Bas-Congo (DRC), Kotanyi, Sophie (Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany)

If you have any queries or suggestions please contact Hein Vanhee (hein.vanhee@africamuseum.be) and Reuben Loffman ( r.loffman@qmul.ac.uk) . For panel and paper submissions please follow the instructions on the website  http://www.asauk.net/call-for-papers-and-panels-asauk-2018-now-open/ 

Photo credit: © The University of Birmingham Research and Cultural Collections. 

Share this:

Leave a Reply